A call to caution for exoplanet hunters

A call to caution for exoplanet hunters

An exoplanet previously thought to have an ocean has now been revealed to be a gas planet.

K2-18b – that's its name – orbits a star located 110 light-years away. Since its discovery in 2015, the planet has stood out: It was in the category of so-called “super-Earths” or “mini-Neptunes,” which refers to rocky planets, not giant gas balls like Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, or Uranus. Neptune. In 2019, astronomers discovered traces of water vapor there, and since this planet is located in what astronomers call the “habitable zone,” therefore, the appropriate distance from its star for this water to be present there in the liquid state: a condition for its presence. life. The most optimistic, given the size of the planet, started talking about the ocean. Finally, in 2023, We found out In the atmosphere, thanks to the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), traces Dimethyl sulfide: A molecule that only living organisms, including plankton, produce on Earth.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

So you don't miss any scientific news and know all about our efforts to fight fake news and misinformation!

However, a new analysis of James Webb Space Telescope data suggests that the abundance of methane and carbon dioxide points more towards a planet that might be a ball of gas, rather than a rocky planet largely covered by an ocean – the reason being explained – is that this would be broken up. Molecules through a process called photolysis if they are swimming in the ocean world. As for dimethyl sulfide, it is a “false signal.”

READ  Hamburg has a future agreement with universities

New search It has only been previously published so far (currently being reviewed for publication in the journal). Astrophysical Journal Letters). But this research It is above all a reminder The fact that the data that astronomers have been able to extract from observations of the James Webb Space Telescope, despite the unprecedented power of this telescope, It remains very partial. And This research is also a reminder Any confirmation of the discovery of a “biosignature” – an atmospheric “fingerprint” that can be attributed to life – should be treated with the utmost caution, as long as it is not confirmed and reconfirmed by other analyses. .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *