Reserve Bank Governor Adrian Orr responded Treasury Secretary Grant Robertson asked for help in fixing the housing crisis, Saying a new government agency is needed.
The new agency will coordinate the government’s response to the housing crisis, which is currently led by multiple parts of the government.
Ur also noted that the tax changes have had an impact on both supply and demand in the housing market, but he declined to recommend specific tax reforms.
The letter, dated December 9, essentially rejected Robertson’s request for help in fixing the housing crisis, indicating that the tools the bank had in place to combat home prices may not have had any impact on the government’s “goal of housing New Zealanders and limiting lack of money.” Equality and poverty. “
It also rejected Robertson’s main suggestion – that the bank consider house prices when setting interest rates.
* Adrian Orr says the new agency needs to fix the housing crisis
* The Reserve Bank tramples MPs in its first major meeting since the election
* Adrian Orr says the evidence is “inconclusive” that low interest rates increase inequality
Instead, Orr returned the case to the government, saying the tools to lower home prices were in its hands.
“Government agencies already have a wide range of levers that can be used to address housing issues,” Ur said.
He said the “key issue” was making sure that those various tools were coordinated, possibly by a new agency.
“Given the broad scope and number of parties involved, and the complexity of the underlying issues, there is a need for a single agency or” clearinghouse “to coordinate the government’s response across agencies, Ur said.
Ur briefly discussed the effect that tax changes could have on the supply and demand side of the housing market. A contract recommending specific tax changes.
The bank considered tools it could use to fix the housing crisis, but indicated that changing interest rates would have serious negative consequences and using its other tools might not be effective.
Orr’s response was a strong rebuttal of Robertson’s earlier suggestion to adjust the bank’s monetary policy shift to avoid instability in house prices.
Ur considered whether it was appropriate to place home prices ‘consideration’ in the purview of monetary policy.
This basically means that whenever a bank thinks about setting interest rates through its various tools, it has to think about the price of housing.
But Orr said he did not think this was a good option and warned that it could have dire consequences, including “higher interest rates leading to lower employment and below target inflation.”
This would lead to a “drop in employment” which “greatly affects those on the margins of the labor market, such as Maori, Pacifica, women and youth.”
“Adding home prices to the monetary policy objective would be unique internationally, which could make monetary policy less effective and affect the efficiency of financial markets, by reducing public understanding of the monetary policy objective,” Orr said.
Instead, the bank preferred that Robertson ask the bank to consider house prices as part of its monetary policy. This is the aspect or bank that looks to keep the financial system running smoothly and safely.
One of the tools that the bank said could be used is the debt-to-income limit, or DTI.
DTIs mean that banks must place limits on how much borrowing people can do in relation to their income.
Currently, the bank only uses loan-to-value ratio (LVR) restrictions, which limit the amount of lending that banks can make to borrowers with low deposits.
Orr asked Robertson to give the bank the authority to use DTIs, but warned that publishing them would disproportionately harm low-income buyers, and warned that it was “ambiguous” whether this would help people deprived of the housing market.
“All these factors harm low income and lower family wealth.”