“MEPs, vote ‘no’ to the EU-New Zealand deal!” »

The trade liberalization agreement between the European Union and New Zealand is scheduled to be ratified on November 21-22 in the European Parliament. The negotiations, with the full support of Emmanuel Macron, began in 2018. They have continued during the Covid-19 pandemic, at their greatest. OpacityWhile there was no shortage of political leaders who promised public opinion the process of transferring activities considered “strategic.”

Just days before the UN Climate Change Conference (COP28), will the European Parliament ratify an agreement that will worsen the climate crisis?

After three years, European parliamentarians must vote on an agreement that will eliminate almost all tariffs on goods and services exchanged between the European Union and New Zealand. according to the study Of influence This plan could generate a 30% increase in trade from the European Commission. These are Thousands of additional containers Which will cross the planet’s oceans while one of them takes about 40 days to reach a European port from Auckland.

After seven years of implementation, imports can be made without customs duties from a country 20,000 kilometers away from the European Union (details in Note Aitec decoder):

• Apple, kiwi, onion, wine, fish, shellfish, honey, etc. without limits;
• 38 thousand tons of sheep meat;
• 10,000 tons of beef;
• 15,000 tons of butter;
• 25 thousand tons of cheese;
• 15 thousand tons of powdered milk.

The same impact study predicts a net increase in… Gas emissions The greenhouse is linked to the transportation of goods and increased production to be exported: agricultural products from New Zealand, automobiles, industrial and consumer products from the European Union. A few days before the UN Climate Change Conference (COP28), will the European Parliament ratify an agreement that will worsen the climate crisis, with the blessing of EU member states, including France?

Submitted by the European Commission on behalf of “Most advanced” agreements, this qualification says more about the unsustainability of other agreements than about the supposed ideal nature of this agreement. there “Reciprocity in imports” What Emmanuel Macron promised for many years has not yet been achieved. New Zealand farmers have the right to use products such as atrazine and diflubenzuron, two chemicals considered toxic Forbidden For use on European territory in 2003 and 2021 respectively.

Brussels and Paris welcome the contents of the agreement “Perfect mirror measurement” This makes it possible not to import meat from cows fattened in feedlots (industrial fattening centers). Except that there are almost no feedlots in New Zealand, livestock farming has historically relied on grazing.

This involves increasing trade flows between the two parties, without requiring it.

On the other hand, only very serious violations of the Paris Climate Agreement (departure) and ILO core standards can be subject to sanctions under the sustainable development chapter of the agreement. This is highly unlikely, and more importantly, the nature of the agreement itself has not changed: it is still about increasing trade flows between the two parties, without these flows being conditional on improving the social and environmental conditions of the sectors. Worried. Finally, violations of obligations undertaken in connection with BiodiversityEnding fossil fuel subsidies, combating deforestation and poaching, gender equality, and corporate responsibility cannot be subject to sanctions.

There are many reasons why around fifty civil society organisations, including around twenty French organizations (ActionAid, Aitec, Friends of the Earth, Attac, Bloom, CGT, Confédération Paysanne, FSU, Fondation pour la Nature and Man, France Nature Environnement) , Generations). Futures, Notre Affaire à Tous, the Veblen Institute and the national association Stop CETA/Mercosur), will be published communication So that European parliamentarians do not ratify this agreement!

The national group Stop CETA-Mercosur stresses that it is not possible to demand the implementation of the European Green Deal and the ratification of an agreement that would exacerbate global warming and lead to the import of goods already produced on European territory from the other end of the planet. The reason behind his invitation to Internet users to Write to Members of the European Parliament through an online procedure In order to obtain their commitment to vote against the ratification of the Convention.

More information to find here.

Maxime Combs for Aitec National collective endowment CETA/Mercosur.